US Bank National Association v. Tracie Green

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 17, 2025
• Docket: 25-1169
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1169 Doc: 24 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1169

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRACIE L. GREEN, a/k/a Tracie Ledora Mitchem-Green,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

CARDINAL PINES HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC.; PALMETTO CITIZENS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (3:22-cv-04215-SAL)

Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 17, 2025

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracie L. Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-1169 Doc: 24 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Tracie L. Green appeals the district court’s order denying her motions to reconsider

the court’s prior order remanding her case to state court. The district court remanded the

case to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

Therefore, the remand order was “not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 1447(d). The district court thus lacked jurisdiction to review the remand order on

reconsideration. See, e.g., Bender v. Mazda Motor Corp., 657 F.3d 1200, 1203 (4th Cir.

2011). We therefore deny Green’s pending motions and affirm the district court’s order

denying her motions for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED