U.S. Bank National Association v. Tapler

E.D. New York

U.S. Bank National Association v. Tapler

DecidedOctober 27, 2020

Docket2:19-cv-01101

StatusUnknown

This text of U.S. Bank National Association v. Tapler (U.S. Bank National Association v. Tapler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U.S. Bank National Association v. Tapler, (E.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------x U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee for the RMAC Trust, series 2016-CTT, ORDER ADOPTING Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - against - 19-CV-1101 (RRM) (ST)

JOSEPH P. TAPLER, et al.,

Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------x ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, Chief United States District Judge.

In a report and recommendation dated September 23, 2020, (the “R&R”), Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione recommended that the Court deny plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against all defendants. (R&R (Doc. No. 20).) Judge Tiscione advised the parties that they had 14 days from the date of that R&R in which to file objections. (Id.) To date, neither party has filed an objection to the R&R. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R is adopted in its entirety and the motion for default judgment against the defendants is denied, and ORDERED that this case is administratively closed without prejudice to any party’s right to reopen upon letter request within 30 days of the New York Court of Appeals decision in CIT Bank N.A. v. Schiffman, 948 F.3d 529 (2d Cir.), certified question accepted, 34 N.Y.3d 1137, 1119 N.Y.S.3d 419, 42 N.E.3d 102 (2020). SO ORDERED.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York Roslynn R. Mauskopf October 27, 2020 ____________________________________ ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------x U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee for the RMAC Trust, series 2016-CTT, ORDER ADOPTING Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - against - 19-CV-1101 (RRM) (ST)

JOSEPH P. TAPLER, et al.,

Defendants. -----------------------------------------------------------------x ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, Chief United States District Judge.

In a report and recommendation dated September 23, 2020, (the “R&R”), Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione recommended that the Court deny plaintiff’s motion for default judgment against all defendants. (R&R (Doc. No. 20).) Judge Tiscione advised the parties that they had 14 days from the date of that R&R in which to file objections. (Id.) To date, neither party has filed an objection to the R&R. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R is adopted in its entirety and the motion for default judgment against the defendants is denied, and ORDERED that this case is administratively closed without prejudice to any party’s right to reopen upon letter request within 30 days of the New York Court of Appeals decision in CIT Bank N.A. v. Schiffman, 948 F.3d 529 (2d Cir.), certified question accepted, 34 N.Y.3d 1137, 1119 N.Y.S.3d 419, 42 N.E.3d 102 (2020). SO ORDERED.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York Roslynn R. Mauskopf October 27, 2020 ____________________________________ ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF Chief United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

U.S. Bank National Association v. Tapler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-national-association-v-tapler-nyed-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack