U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 8, 2021
DocketSCWC-21-0000084
StatusPublished

This text of U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley (U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley, (haw 2021).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 08-SEP-2021 11:00 AM Dkt. 7 ODSAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, WMABS, SERIES 2006-HE1, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JAN MOXLEY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,

and

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 3CC171000292)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/defendant-appellant Jan Moxley’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 26, 2021, is dismissed. See HRS § 602-59; HRAP Rule 40.1(a). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 8, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 602-59
Hawaii § 602-59

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-national-association-v-moxley-haw-2021.