U.S. Bank National Association v. Miro-Ruiz
This text of U.S. Bank National Association v. Miro-Ruiz (U.S. Bank National Association v. Miro-Ruiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 28-OCT-2022 07:59 AM Dkt. 53 OAWST
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee Successor in Interest to Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Trustee, Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-1, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHONG MIRO-RUIZ, KEHALANI COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellees, and LAUNANI ASSETS, LLC, a Hawaii Limited Liability Company, Defendant-Appellant-Intervenor and DOES 1-20 Inclusive, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 2CC161000436)
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal (Stipulation), filed October 20, 2022, by Plaintiff- Appellee U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association as Trustee, Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates, Series 2005-1, (U.S. Bank), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) the appeal has been docketed; (2) the parties to the appeal, U.S. Bank and Launani NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Assets LLC, a Hawaii Limited Liability Company (Launani) stipulate to dismiss the appeal and have specified the terms as to payment of attorneys' fees and costs and agreed that there are no outstanding fees and costs due; (3) Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b) authorizes the "parties to a docketed appeal" to "sign and file a stipulation for dismissal"; and (4) the Stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties appearing in the appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal of Appeal is approved, and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 28, 2022.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
U.S. Bank National Association v. Miro-Ruiz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-national-association-v-miro-ruiz-hawapp-2022.