US Bank National Ass'n v. Williams

2017 NY Slip Op 6098, 153 A.D.3d 650, 57 N.Y.S.3d 431
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 9, 2017·No. 2015-04045·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Michael Williams appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Livote, J.), entered December 29, 2014, which denied his motion to compel the deposition of nonparty witnesses.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Where, as here, a defendant defaults in answering the complaint, he or she forfeits the right to engage in discovery (see Rudra v Friedman, 123 AD3d 1104, 1104 [2014]; Kolonkowski v Daily News, L.P., 112 AD3d 677 [2013]; Singh v Friedson, 36 AD3d 605, 606 [2007]; Amato v Fast Repair, Inc., 15 AD3d 429, 430 [2005]; Santiago v Siega, 255 AD2d 307, 307-308 [1998]). Accordingly, since the defendant Michael Williams defaulted in answering the complaint, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to compel the deposition of nonparty *651 witnesses.

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

US Bank National Ass'n v. Williams, 2017 NY Slip Op 6098, 153 A.D.3d 650, 57 N.Y.S.3d 431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 6098 (US Bank National Ass'n v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudra v. Friedman
123 A.D.3d 1104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Amato v. Fast Repair, Inc.
15 A.D.3d 429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Singh v. Friedson
36 A.D.3d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Kolonkowski v. Daily News, L.P.
112 A.D.3d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Santiago v. Siega
255 A.D.2d 307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)