U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Martinez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Martinez

188 So. 3d 107, 2016 WL 1260816, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5029

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 1, 2016

Docket5D15-2928

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 188 So. 3d 107 (U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Martinez, 188 So. 3d 107, 2016 WL 1260816, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5029 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

EVANDER, J.

' U.S. Bank National Association, etc. (“the Bank”), appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to set aside an order dismissing its foreclosure action. The trial court dismissed the Bank’s action because of the failure of its counsel to appear at a case management conference. In its motion to set aside the' dismissal, the Bank asserted that counsel’s failure to appear was because either the notice for the case management conference had not been received or, alternatively, the notice had not been calendared. A supporting affidavit was attached to the motion. The Bank’s motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.200(c) provides that if a party fails to attend either a pretrial or case management conference, the court may “dismiss the action, strike the pleadings, limit proof or witnesses, or take any other appropriate action.” However, the sanction must be commensurate with the offense. Drakeford v. Barnett Bank of Tampa, 694 So.2d 822, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Because dismissal of an action is “the harshest of all sanctions,” the trial court must explicitly find that the party’s actions were willful, flagrant, deliberate, or otherwise aggravated. Perkins v. Jacksonville Hous. Auth., 175 So.3d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); see also Petersen & Hawthorne, P.A. v. EMI Enters., Inc., 115 So.3d 1064, 1064-65 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Fugnole v. Crumbly Bros., Inc., 899 So.2d 1262, 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). In the instant case, no such findings were made. Additionally, the Bank’s motion set forth prima facie grounds to set aside the dismissal. See Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Brogdon, 185 So.3d 627, 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (reversing trial court’s dismissal of foreclosure complaint without prejudice, where counsel’s failure to appear at hearing due *109 to inadvertent secretarial error amounted to excusable neglect under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.640(b)). Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to summarily deny the Bank’s motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EVANDER, J.

' U.S. Bank National Association, etc. (“the Bank”), appeals the trial court’s denial of its motion to set aside an order dismissing its foreclosure action. The trial court dismissed the Bank’s action because of the failure of its counsel to appear at a case management conference. In its motion to set aside the' dismissal, the Bank asserted that counsel’s failure to appear was because either the notice for the case management conference had not been received or, alternatively, the notice had not been calendared. A supporting affidavit was attached to the motion. The Bank’s motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing. We reverse.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.200(c) provides that if a party fails to attend either a pretrial or case management conference, the court may “dismiss the action, strike the pleadings, limit proof or witnesses, or take any other appropriate action.” However, the sanction must be commensurate with the offense. Drakeford v. Barnett Bank of Tampa, 694 So.2d 822, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Because dismissal of an action is “the harshest of all sanctions,” the trial court must explicitly find that the party’s actions were willful, flagrant, deliberate, or otherwise aggravated. Perkins v. Jacksonville Hous. Auth., 175 So.3d 948 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); see also Petersen & Hawthorne, P.A. v. EMI Enters., Inc., 115 So.3d 1064, 1064-65 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Fugnole v. Crumbly Bros., Inc., 899 So.2d 1262, 1263 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). In the instant case, no such findings were made. Additionally, the Bank’s motion set forth prima facie grounds to set aside the dismissal. See Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Brogdon, 185 So.3d 627, 628 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (reversing trial court’s dismissal of foreclosure complaint without prejudice, where counsel’s failure to appear at hearing due *109 to inadvertent secretarial error amounted to excusable neglect under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.640(b)). Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to summarily deny the Bank’s motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 So. 3d 107, 2016 WL 1260816, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-national-assn-v-martinez-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack