U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Eaddy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Eaddy

123 A.D.3d 809, 996 N.Y.S.2d 546

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 2014

Docket2013-00190

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.3d 809 (U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Eaddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Eaddy, 123 A.D.3d 809, 996 N.Y.S.2d 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Shelley R. Eaddy appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, Jr., J.), dated October 9, 2012, which denied her motion, in effect, for leave to reargue her prior motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court (Berliner, J.), dated September 9, 2009, entered upon her failure to appear or answer the complaint, which had been denied in an order of the same court (Alfieri, Jr., J.), dated July 5, 2011.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The motion of the defendant Shelley R. Eaddy was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Since “no appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue” (O’Brien v O’Brien, 115 AD3d 720, 721-722 [2014]), Eaddy’s appeal must be dismissed (see JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Smith Elec. Contr., Inc., 117 AD3d 909 [2014]; Matter of County of Broome, 90 AD3d 1260 [2011]).

Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Shelley R. Eaddy appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, Jr., J.), dated October 9, 2012, which denied her motion, in effect, for leave to reargue her prior motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court (Berliner, J.), dated September 9, 2009, entered upon her failure to appear or answer the complaint, which had been denied in an order of the same court (Alfieri, Jr., J.), dated July 5, 2011.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The motion of the defendant Shelley R. Eaddy was, in effect, one for leave to reargue. Since “no appeal lies from an order denying leave to reargue” (O’Brien v O’Brien, 115 AD3d 720, 721-722 [2014]), Eaddy’s appeal must be dismissed (see JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Smith Elec. Contr., Inc., 117 AD3d 909 [2014]; Matter of County of Broome, 90 AD3d 1260 [2011]).

Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Roman and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.3d 809, 996 N.Y.S.2d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-national-assn-v-eaddy-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack