U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall

944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 6, 2011
Docket2011-0218
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 944 N.E.2d 693 (U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall, 944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2011).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 94174, 2010-Ohio-6478. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 31, 2011:

“To have standing as a plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure action, must a party show that it owned the note and the mortgage when the complaint was filed?”
Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict eases are U.S. Bank, N.A v. Bayless, Delaware App. No. 09 CAE 01 004, 2009-Ohio-6115, U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Marcino, 181 Ohio App.3d 328, 2009-Ohio-1178, Bank of New York v. Stuart, Lorain App. No. 06CA008953, 2007-Ohio-1483, and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P. v. Thomas, Franklin App. No. 09AP-819, 2010-Ohio-3018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Wallace
957 N.E.2d 92 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Schwartzwald
2011 Ohio 2681 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-na-v-duvall-ohio-2011.