U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall

Ohio Supreme Court

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall

944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 6, 2011·No. 2011-0218·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 94174, 2010-Ohio-6478. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 31, 2011:

“To have standing as a plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure action, must a party show that it owned the note and the mortgage when the complaint was filed?”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict eases are U.S. Bank, N.A v. Bayless, Delaware App. No. 09 CAE 01 004, 2009-Ohio-6115, U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Marcino, 181 Ohio App.3d 328, 2009-Ohio-1178, Bank of New York v. Stuart, Lorain App. No. 06CA008953, 2007-Ohio-1483, and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P. v. Thomas, Franklin App. No. 09AP-819, 2010-Ohio-3018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 94174, 2010-Ohio-6478. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 31, 2011:

“To have standing as a plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure action, must a party show that it owned the note and the mortgage when the complaint was filed?”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict eases are U.S. Bank, N.A v. Bayless, Delaware App. No. 09 CAE 01 004, 2009-Ohio-6115, U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Marcino, 181 Ohio App.3d 328, 2009-Ohio-1178, Bank of New York v. Stuart, Lorain App. No. 06CA008953, 2007-Ohio-1483, and Countrywide Home Loan Servicing, L.P. v. Thomas, Franklin App. No. 09AP-819, 2010-Ohio-3018.

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall, 944 N.E.2d 693, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1443 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

944 N.E.2d 693 (U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Duvall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related