U.S. Bank N.A. v. Carrano

2020 NY Slip Op 04988, 186 A.D.3d 1449, 128 N.Y.S.3d 847
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 16, 2020
DocketIndex No. 514085/17
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 04988 (U.S. Bank N.A. v. Carrano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Carrano, 2020 NY Slip Op 04988, 186 A.D.3d 1449, 128 N.Y.S.3d 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

U.S. Bank N.A. v Carrano (2020 NY Slip Op 04988)
U.S. Bank N.A. v Carrano
2020 NY Slip Op 04988
Decided on September 16, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 16, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO
RUTH C. BALKIN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.

2018-14049
(Index No. 514085/17)

[*1]U.S. Bank National Association, etc., appellant,

v

Patrick L. Carrano, respondent, et al., defendants.


Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, New York, NY (Brain McGrath of counsel), for appellant.

Law Office of Laurence D. Gerowitz, P.C., New York, NY, for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Noach Dear, J.), dated October 10, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of the defendant Patrick L. Carrano for leave to reargue his prior motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him as time-barred, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated January 10, 2018, and, upon reargument, in effect, vacated the provision in the order dated January 10, 2018, denying that branch of that defendant's prior motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him as time-barred, and thereupon granted that branch of that defendant's prior motion.

ORDERED that the order dated October 10, 2018, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The order dated October 10, 2018, is affirmed insofar as appealed from for reasons stated in Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Schmitt (172 AD3d 1324).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MASTRO, BALKIN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carrano v. U.S. Bank
2025 NY Slip Op 34052(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 04988, 186 A.D.3d 1449, 128 N.Y.S.3d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-bank-na-v-carrano-nyappdiv-2020.