U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 668 F. App'x 363
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 8, 2016·No. 16-1302·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

U.S. BANCORP, Appellant

v.

SOLUTRAN, INC., Appellee ______________________

2016-1302 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2014- 00076. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by MICHELLE DAWSON.

ROBERT JAMES GILBERTSON, Greene Espel, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by SYBIL LOUISE DUNLOP. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 8, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2016).

U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc. (U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.