U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
U.S. BANCORP, Appellant
v.
SOLUTRAN, INC., Appellee ______________________
2016-1302 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. CBM2014- 00076. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by MICHELLE DAWSON.
ROBERT JAMES GILBERTSON, Greene Espel, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by SYBIL LOUISE DUNLOP. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 8, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc. (U.S. Bancorp v. Solutran, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.