U.S. Asiatic Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

U.S. Asiatic Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 858, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2001

United States Customs Court·Decided January 9, 1967·No. No. P67/7; protests 62/5025, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material- respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material- respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

U.S. Asiatic Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 858, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2001 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

58 Cust. Ct. 858 (U.S. Asiatic Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related