U.S. 1 Office Corp. v. L.J. Hooker International Florida, Inc.
632 So. 2d 722, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1805, 1994 WL 68849
This text of 632 So. 2d 722 (U.S. 1 Office Corp. v. L.J. Hooker International Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
U.S. 1 Office Corp. v. L.J. Hooker International Florida, Inc., 632 So. 2d 722, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1805, 1994 WL 68849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Gibson v. Courtois, 539 So.2d 459 (Fla.1989); Goff v. Indian Lake Estates, Inc., 178 So.2d 910 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). Compare generally Nguyen v. Roth Realty, Inc., 550 So.2d 490, 491 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (real estate sales contract provides for expiration of contract and payment of commission beyond expiration date).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gibson v. Courtois
539 So. 2d 459 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Goff v. Indian Lake Estates, Inc.
178 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Nguyen v. Roth Realty, Inc.
550 So. 2d 490 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 722, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1805, 1994 WL 68849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/us-1-office-corp-v-lj-hooker-international-florida-inc-fladistctapp-1994.