Ursula Ann Langley v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 2026
Docket6D2025-1520
StatusPublished

This text of Ursula Ann Langley v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1 (Ursula Ann Langley v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ursula Ann Langley v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2025-1520 Lower Tribunal No. 2017-CA-001261 _____________________________

URSULA ANN LANGLEY,

Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Indenture Trustee for NEW CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-1,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County. James F. Stewart, Judge.

May 29, 2026

NARDELLA, J.

Ursula Ann Langley (“Appellant”) appeals the trial court’s order denying her

motion to set aside the foreclosure sale. She contends the sale should be set aside

because the trial court failed to hold an evidentiary hearing on her emergency motion

to stay the foreclosure sale pending her appeal of the foreclosure judgment. This

issue was rendered moot by the Court’s affirmance of the foreclosure judgment. Langley v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Tr. Co., as indenture Tr. for New Century Home

Equity Loan Tr. 2004-1, 418 So. 3d 324 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025); see Godwin v. State,

593 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1992) (“An issue is moot when the controversy has been

so fully resolved that a judicial determination can have no actual effect.”). Further,

we do not find, as the Appellant argues, that the issue raised is one of great public

importance and, thus, capable of review despite its mootness. Therefore, the appeal

is dismissed as moot. Godwin, 593 So. 2d at 212 (“A moot case generally will be

dismissed.”).

DISMISSED.

SMITH and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

James R. Ackley, of Law Offices of James R. Ackley, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Eric M. Levine and Adam G. Schwartz, of Atlas│Solomon, LLP, Stuart, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Godwin v. State
593 So. 2d 211 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ursula Ann Langley v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2004-1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ursula-ann-langley-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-company-as-indenture-fladistctapp-2026.