Ursi v. Ursi
21 So. 3d 45, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13727, 2009 WL 2933725
Opinion
Denied. See Ellis v. Henning, 678 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“Without a transcript or sworn factual allegations concerning the context in which the trial judge’s alleged comments arose, we do not find that the allegations in plaintiffs motions to disqualify set forth a legally sufficient ground for recusal.... A trial judge’s expression of dissatisfaction with counsel or a client’s behavior alone does not give rise to a reasonable belief that the trial judge is biased and the client cannot receive a fair trial.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ursi v. Ursi, 21 So. 3d 45, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13727, 2009 WL 2933725 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
21 So. 3d 45 (Ursi v. Ursi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. Henning
678 So. 2d 825 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)