Ursi v. Ursi
This text of 21 So. 3d 45 (Ursi v. Ursi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied. See Ellis v. Henning, 678 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“Without a transcript or sworn factual allegations concerning the context in which the trial judge’s alleged comments arose, we do not find that the allegations in plaintiffs motions to disqualify set forth a legally sufficient ground for recusal.... A trial judge’s expression of dissatisfaction with counsel or a client’s behavior alone does not give rise to a reasonable belief that the trial judge is biased and the client cannot receive a fair trial.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 So. 3d 45, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13727, 2009 WL 2933725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ursi-v-ursi-fladistctapp-2009.