Urscher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Urscher v. State

697 So. 2d 588, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9057, 1997 WL 447615

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 8, 1997

DocketNo. 97-1075

StatusPublished

This text of 697 So. 2d 588 (Urscher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Urscher v. State, 697 So. 2d 588, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9057, 1997 WL 447615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We elect to treat this pro se criminal motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) as an initial brief and appeal from his criminal conviction and sentence. We find no reversible error. Urscher was adjudicated and sentenced pursuant to the terms of his plea agreement and he received a legal sentence for his offense.

AFFIRMED, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We elect to treat this pro se criminal motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) as an initial brief and appeal from his criminal conviction and sentence. We find no reversible error. Urscher was adjudicated and sentenced pursuant to the terms of his plea agreement and he received a legal sentence for his offense.

AFFIRMED, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).

DAUKSCH, COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 So. 2d 588, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9057, 1997 WL 447615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urscher-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.