Ursa Operating Company LLC v.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 25, 2024·No. 22-1729·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________

No. 22-1729 _______________

IN RE: URSA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, Debtor

AIRPORT LAND PARTNERS, LTD; JOHN ANDERSON; FERNANDO JOSE ARROYO; BAR SEVEN L, LLC; ALLEN BYERLEY; RICHARD N. CASEY; ALICE COLTON; DON COLTON; GREGG COLTON; DANIELS PETROLEUM COMPANY AND BARRETT BAKER AS PRESIDENT; VERNON P. DEDISSE, JR.; MARY RUTH DEDISSE, DIVIDE CREEK ENTERPRISES, LLC; ENERGY INVESTMENTS, INC., HUNTER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; JERRY D. JONES, INDIVIDUALLY AS TRUSTEE OF THE PAULA JONES SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST; CHRISTINE JONES; JUHAN LP; JUHAN-RAY, LLC; JUHAN FORDHAM MINERALS, LLC; PETER LANGEGGER; LARAMIDE GEOSCIENCES, LLC; THOMAS D. LAWSON; FRED LIMBACH; PAUL LIMBACH; NANCI LIMBACH; STACIE ANDERSON MALONE; MAP2003-NET, AN OKLAHOMA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; MAP2004-OK. AN OKLAHOMA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, MAP99A-NET, A TEXAS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; KRISTINE M. PETERSON; MICHAEL PINNELL; PIONEER OIL AND GAS; KELLEY ANDERSON RINEHART; ROY ROYALTY, INC.; JASON ALAN SCOTT; JOSEPH EDWARD SCOTT; REBECCA P. SCOTT; SHARON SALGADO; SHIDELER ENERGY COMPANY, LLC; SHIDELEROSA, LLP; PATRICK L. SHUSTER; TONI M. SHUSTER; THE CITY OF RIFLE, COLORADO; TITAN ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION; WATSON RANCHES, LTD; BRETT JAMES WATSON; DIANA K. WATSON; JAMES L. WATSON; LEE WATSON AND EVADEAN WATSON, AS CO- TRUSTEES OF THE WATSON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, AND VELMA WEINREIS (COLLECTIVELY, THE “ROYAL CLAIMANTS”), Appellants _______________

(D.C. Civil No. 1-21-cv-00495)

ORDER Present: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, JORDAN, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, CHUNG, and FISHER* Circuit Judges

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant in the above-entitled case having been

submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all other

available circuit judges in regular active service, it is hereby

O R D E R E D that the petition for rehearing by the panel is granted and the petition for

rehearing en banc is denied. The Clerk is directed to file the amended opinion and

judgment contemporaneously with this Order.

BY THE COURT,

s/ David J. Porter Circuit Judge Date: January 25, 2024 CJG/cc: All Counsel of Record

* Judge Fisher’s vote is limited to panel rehearing only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ursa Operating Company LLC v., (3d Cir. 2024).

Ursa Operating Company LLC v. (Ursa Operating Company LLC v.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.