URS Corporation-New York v. Expert Electric, Inc.
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4782 (URS Corporation-New York v. Expert Electric, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered February 8, 2017, awarding petitioner attorneys’ fees, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the judgment vacated.
The court properly declined to vacate respondent’s default, upon which petitioner’s motion to cancel the public improvement lien filed by respondent was granted, because respondent failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see Lopez-Reyes v Heriveaux, 144 AD3d 486 [1st Dept 2016]).
The court erred in awarding petitioner attorneys’ fees since, *521 as petitioner concedes, attorneys’ fees are not authorized either by statute or court rule, and we find that the contractual provisions on which petitioner relies do not authorize an award of attorneys’ fees in the instant circumstances (see Matter of A.G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1, 5 [1986]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 4782, 151 A.D.3d 520, 53 N.Y.S.3d 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urs-corporation-new-york-v-expert-electric-inc-nyappdiv-2017.