Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Urquiaga v. State

Urquiaga v. State

624 So. 2d 810, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9747, 1993 WL 392483
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1993
DocketNos. 93-769, 92-1156
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 624 So. 2d 810 (Urquiaga v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Urquiaga v. State, 624 So. 2d 810, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9747, 1993 WL 392483 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rafael Urquiaga appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentence to conform to the sentencing judge’s oral pronouncements. After review of the sentencing transcript, we agree with appellant that the orally announced sentence called for two concurrent three-year mandatory minimum sentences, not consecutive mandatory minimum sentences. The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to correct the sentencing order ae-cordingly.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nodal v. State
650 So. 2d 696 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Katzin v. Mansdorf
624 So. 2d 810 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 So. 2d 810, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9747, 1993 WL 392483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urquiaga-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.