Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Urmeala R. v. Kusaw M.

Urmeala R. v. Kusaw M.

89 A.D.3d 411, 931 N.Y.2d 855
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 1, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.3d 411 (Urmeala R. v. Kusaw M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Urmeala R. v. Kusaw M., 89 A.D.3d 411, 931 N.Y.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The determination that respondent committed the offense of harassment in the second degree was supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see Penal Law § 240.26; Family Ct Act § 832). The record shows that on various occasions, respondent pinched petitioner, pulled her hair and kicked her in the stomach at a time when she was pregnant. There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the court (see Matter of Hunt v Hunt, 51 AD3d 924, 925 [2008]). Concur— Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Sweeny, Renwick and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunt v. Hunt
51 A.D.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 411, 931 N.Y.2d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urmeala-r-v-kusaw-m-nyappdiv-2011.