Urist v. Rubin
This text of 195 Misc. 50 (Urist v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court below was without power to grant the amendment sought. Such amendment involves a substantial change, and is in substance, a new decision (Heinitz v. Darmstadt, 140 App. Div. 252; Shames v. Barrett, 166 N. Y. S. 756; Trustees of Masonic Ball Asylum Fund v. Fontana, 99 Misc. 497). The final order in each case, so far as «appealed from by landlord, should be affirmed, with $30 costs to respondents, as of one appeal.
Orders amending final order in each case, so far as appealed from by tenants, should be reversed and motion to amend final order in each case denied.
Hammer, Pecora and Eder, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 Misc. 50, 88 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urist-v-rubin-nyappterm-1949.