Urist v. Rubin

195 Misc. 50, 88 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2191
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 10, 1949·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court below was without power to grant the amendment sought. Such amendment involves a substantial change, and is in substance, a new decision (Heinitz v. Darmstadt, 140 App. Div. 252; Shames v. Barrett, 166 N. Y. S. 756; Trustees of Masonic Ball Asylum Fund v. Fontana, 99 Misc. 497). The final order in each case, so far as «appealed from by landlord, should be affirmed, with $30 costs to respondents, as of one appeal.

Orders amending final order in each case, so far as appealed from by tenants, should be reversed and motion to amend final order in each case denied.

Hammer, Pecora and Eder, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Urist v. Rubin, 195 Misc. 50, 88 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

195 Misc. 50 (Urist v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heinitz v. Darmstadt
140 A.D. 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. Fontana
99 Misc. 497 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)