Uriel v. Office of Personnel Management

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 10, 2007·No. 2007-3143·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-3143

MARIA E. URIEL,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

John D. Gates, of El Paso, Texas, agrued for petitioner.

Matthew H. Solomson, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Acting Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director.

Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board

in CASE NO(S). DA0843060555-I-1

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LINN, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED December 10, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uriel v. Office of Personnel Management, (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Uriel v. Office of Personnel Management (Uriel v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.