Uricola v. Uricola
776 So. 2d 1028, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 2001 WL 55756
This text of 776 So. 2d 1028 (Uricola v. Uricola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Uricola v. Uricola, 776 So. 2d 1028, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 2001 WL 55756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
The Appellee concedes that the venue order should be reversed because it was entered without an evidentiary hearing. See Vero v. Vero, 659 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vero v. Vero
659 So. 2d 1348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
776 So. 2d 1028, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 2001 WL 55756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uricola-v-uricola-fladistctapp-2001.