Uricola v. Uricola

776 So. 2d 1028, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 2001 WL 55756
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-3436
StatusPublished

This text of 776 So. 2d 1028 (Uricola v. Uricola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uricola v. Uricola, 776 So. 2d 1028, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 2001 WL 55756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Appellee concedes that the venue order should be reversed because it was entered without an evidentiary hearing. See Vero v. Vero, 659 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

DELL, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vero v. Vero
659 So. 2d 1348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 So. 2d 1028, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 492, 2001 WL 55756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uricola-v-uricola-fladistctapp-2001.