Uribe v. Selman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Uribe v. Selman

894 So. 2d 306, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2064, 2005 WL 418697

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2005·No. No. 3D04-2800·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part. We remand solely for the purpose of reevaluation by the trial court of the Father’s visitation schedule, outlined in the trial court’s Order Paragraph 3 subparts a-e, to comport more fully with the visitation schedule as provided for in Paragraph 18(3)(a)-(j) of the parties’ Agreement for Modification of Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage entered into on March 31, 2000.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part. We remand solely for the purpose of reevaluation by the trial court of the Father’s visitation schedule, outlined in the trial court’s Order Paragraph 3 subparts a-e, to comport more fully with the visitation schedule as provided for in Paragraph 18(3)(a)-(j) of the parties’ Agreement for Modification of Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage entered into on March 31, 2000.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

Uribe v. Selman, 894 So. 2d 306, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2064, 2005 WL 418697 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

894 So. 2d 306 (Uribe v. Selman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.