Uribe v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:21-cv-00160-WCM

TANYA M. URIBE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL ) SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ )

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consent Petition for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (the “Motion,” Doc. 18). Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), the Court must award attorney’s fees to a prevailing party in a civil action brought against the United States unless the Court finds that the Government’s position was “substantially justified” or that “special circumstances” would make such an award unjust. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Because the Court ordered that this case be remanded to the Social Security Administration, Plaintiff is properly considered a “prevailing party” in this action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 302, 113 S.Ct. 2625, 2635, 125 L.Ed.2d 239 (1993); Docs. 16 & 17. An award of attorney’s fees under the EAJA must be “reasonable.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b). It is within the Court’s discretion to award attorney’s fees

above the statutory hourly rate. See Payne v. Sullivan, 977 F.2d 900, 903 (4th Cir. 1992). The Motion indicates that Plaintiff seeks $6,950.00 in fees. Doc. 18. Plaintiff represents that the Commissioner consents to the Motion, and that

counsel have settled upon the amount sought “for 29.40 hours of attorney work and 4.90 hours of paralegal time performing attorney tasks.” Id. at 1.1 Plaintiff’s counsel has also submitted a summary of time spent on this civil action. Doc. 18-1.

After review and consideration of the Motion, the supporting documents, and applicable authority, the Court will allow the Motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) Plaintiff’s Consent Petition for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 18) is GRANTED and Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,950.00. (“Fee Award”).

1 “Although fees for paralegal time may be recoverable under the EAJA, such fees are only recoverable to the extent they reflect tasks traditionally performed by an attorney and for which the attorney would customarily charge the client.” Hyatt v. Barnhart, 315 F.3d 239, 255 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing Jean v. Nelson, 863 F.2d 759, 778 (11th Cir. 1988)). (2) As EAJA fees belong to the litigant and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, see Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 589 (2010), the Fee Award shall be paid by Defendant as follows:

a. If Plaintiff has federal debt registered with the Department of the Treasury that may be offset by the Fee Award, such amount of the Fee Award as is necessary to satisfy Plaintiff's federal debt shall be so used, up to and including the entire amount of the Fee Award. b. The remaining balance of the Fee Award after application of the offset, if any, described above shall be delivered by Defendant to Plaintiffs counsel on behalf of Plaintiff.

Signed: May 17, 2023

W. Carleton Metcalf py United States Magistrate Judge + AM J