Uribe v. Baca

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided September 7, 2021·No. 3:15-cv-00309·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 OSCAR URIBE, Case No.: 3:15-cv-00309-RCJ-WGC 8 Petitioner Order 9 v. 10 ISIDRO BACA, et al., 11 Respondents. 12

13 14 This case is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by Oscar 15 Uribe, a Nevada prisoner. The Court denied Uribe’s petition on April 29, 2021, and judgment 16 was entered accordingly. See ECF Nos. 39, 40. A copy of the order denying the petition was 17 mailed to Uribe, but it was returned to the Court on May 21, 2021, with the notation “not 18 deliverable as addressed.” See ECF No. 41. Thereafter, Uribe filed a request for status on June 19 28, 2012, and, in response, this Court ordered the clerk to resend a copy of the order denying the 20 petition to Uribe on July 1, 2012. ECF Nos. 42, 43. Twenty-one days later, on July 22, 2021, 21 Uribe moved to reopen the time to file an appeal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 22 Procedure (“FRAP”) 4(a)(6). ECF No. 44. The respondents did not respond to Uribe’s motion. 23 1 Under FRAP 4(a)(6), a district court may reopen the time for filing an appeal for a period of 14 days if (a) the court finds that the moving party did not receive notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 77(d) of the entry of the judgment or order sought to be appealed within 21 4 days after entry, (b) the motion is filed within 180 days after the judgment or order is entered or within 14 days after the moving party receives notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 77(d) of the entry, whichever is earlier; and (c) the court finds that no party would be prejudiced. 7 This Court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a motion to reopen. See United States v. 8 Withers, 638 F.3d 1055, 1061-62 (9th Cir. 2011). Given (1) the fact that Uribe did not timely 9] receive the Court’s April 29, 2021, order, (2) the time it takes mail to be processed at the Nevada 10 Department of Corrections, especially due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and (3) the respondents 11] lack of a response, the Court exercises its discretion to grant Uribe’s motion to reopen the time to 12 file an appeal. 13 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to reopen the time to file an appeal (ECF No. 44) is granted. 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner shall have 14 days from the date of this 16] order to file a notice of appeal from this Court’s April 29, 2021, order. (ECF No. 39.) 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the petitioner at 18] the address listed on his motion at ECF No. 44 (High Desert State Prison) and shall modify the 19] petitioner’s mailing address in the court’s electronic filing system to the same. DATED: September 7, 2021. 21 be foe R@BERT C. JON 02 UNITED STATE% DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Uribe v. Baca, (D. Nev. 2021).

Uribe v. Baca (Uribe v. Baca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Withers
638 F.3d 1055 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)