Uribe, Pablo Enrique
This text of Uribe, Pablo Enrique (Uribe, Pablo Enrique) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,078-01
EX PARTE PABLO ENRIQUE URIBE, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. B-17-2098-0-CR-B-1 IN THE 156TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of assault on a public servant and sentenced to ten years’
imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of
conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he is being denied due process in the parole revocation process.
Applicant alleges that while out on parole he was arrested for new charges, but no formal charges
have been filed. He says a parole revocation warrant was issued and executed, but he has been held
for more than 41 days without a parole revocation hearing and without being formally charged with
the new offense.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. TEX . GOV ’T CODE Sec. 2
508.282; Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S 471, 488, 92 S. Ct. 2593, 33 L. Ed. 2d 484 (1972).
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings
of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with
knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in
Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant
is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall
appoint counsel to represent at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is
appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant has been advised of his
rights in the revocation process, whether he requested or has received a preliminary hearing, and
whether he has received a final revocation hearing. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to
whether Applicant was arrested for a new offense, and if so, whether he has been formally charged
with a new offense. The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether
Applicant is being afforded due process in the parole revocation process. The trial court may make
any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: November 10, 2021 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uribe, Pablo Enrique, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uribe-pablo-enrique-texcrimapp-2021.