Urgo v. Coster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Urgo v. Coster

275 A.D.2d 951

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1949·Published

Opinion

Respondent has one apartment in his two-family dwelling into which he has brought to live with him his parents, his brother, and the family of the latter. He is not entitled to possession of both apartments in the dwelling nor can he obtain a second apartment on behalf of his relatives. (Matter of Prete v. Finkelstein, 274 App. Div. 905.) In any event, his hardship is self-created. (Matter of Meyer v. Finkelstein, 275 App. Div. 837.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent has one apartment in his two-family dwelling into which he has brought to live with him his parents, his brother, and the family of the latter. He is not entitled to possession of both apartments in the dwelling nor can he obtain a second apartment on behalf of his relatives. (Matter of Prete v. Finkelstein, 274 App. Div. 905.) In any event, his hardship is self-created. (Matter of Meyer v. Finkelstein, 275 App. Div. 837.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Urgo v. Coster, 275 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

275 A.D.2d 951 (Urgo v. Coster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related