Urgo v. Coster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Urgo v. Coster

275 A.D.2d 951

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 951 (Urgo v. Coster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Urgo v. Coster, 275 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Respondent has one apartment in his two-family dwelling into which he has brought to live with him his parents, his brother, and the family of the latter. He is not entitled to possession of both apartments in the dwelling nor can he obtain a second apartment on behalf of his relatives. (Matter of Prete v. Finkelstein, 274 App. Div. 905.) In any event, his hardship is self-created. (Matter of Meyer v. Finkelstein, 275 App. Div. 837.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent has one apartment in his two-family dwelling into which he has brought to live with him his parents, his brother, and the family of the latter. He is not entitled to possession of both apartments in the dwelling nor can he obtain a second apartment on behalf of his relatives. (Matter of Prete v. Finkelstein, 274 App. Div. 905.) In any event, his hardship is self-created. (Matter of Meyer v. Finkelstein, 275 App. Div. 837.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urgo-v-coster-nyappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack