Urena v. United States

S.D. New York

Urena v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 25, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-09995-PAE·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CARLOS URENA,

Petitioner, 18 Civ. 9995 (PAE) -v- 11 Cr. 1032-4 (PAE)

UNITED STATES, ORDER Respondent.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The Court re-appoints Mr. Urena’s trial counsel, Gregory Cooper, Esq,, for the limited purpose of submitted a letter-memorandum in support of his 2255 petition based on United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). See 18-cv-9995, Dkt. 17. Such a letter memorandum is due Friday, September 11, 2020. The Government’s response is due Friday, September 25, 2020. SO ORDERED.

__________________________________ PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge Dated: August 25, 2020 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CARLOS URENA,

Petitioner, 18 Civ. 9995 (PAE) -v- 11 Cr. 1032-4 (PAE)

UNITED STATES, ORDER Respondent.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The Court re-appoints Mr. Urena’s trial counsel, Gregory Cooper, Esq,, for the limited purpose of submitted a letter-memorandum in support of his 2255 petition based on United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). See 18-cv-9995, Dkt. 17. Such a letter memorandum is due Friday, September 11, 2020. The Government’s response is due Friday, September 25, 2020. SO ORDERED.

__________________________________ PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge Dated: August 25, 2020 New York, New York

Urena v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Urena v. United States (Urena v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related