Urena v. United States

S.D. New York

Urena v. United States

DecidedAugust 25, 2020

Docket1:18-cv-09995-PAE

StatusUnknown

This text of Urena v. United States (Urena v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Urena v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CARLOS URENA,

Petitioner, 18 Civ. 9995 (PAE) -v- 11 Cr. 1032-4 (PAE)

UNITED STATES, ORDER Respondent.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The Court re-appoints Mr. Urena’s trial counsel, Gregory Cooper, Esq,, for the limited purpose of submitted a letter-memorandum in support of his 2255 petition based on United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). See 18-cv-9995, Dkt. 17. Such a letter memorandum is due Friday, September 11, 2020. The Government’s response is due Friday, September 25, 2020. SO ORDERED.

__________________________________ PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge Dated: August 25, 2020 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI