Urena v. Perlman
This text of 27 A.D.3d 1140 (Urena v. Perlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Samuel D. Hester, J.], entered April 25, 2005) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.
It is hereby ordered that said proceeding be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Free v Coombe, 234 AD2d 996 [1996]). Present— Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.3d 1140, 810 N.Y.S.2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urena-v-perlman-nyappdiv-2006.