Urena v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

42 A.D.2d 888, 347 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 13, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 18, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the motion denied, without costs and without disbursements. The application is for leave to sue MVAIC pursuant to section 618 of the Insurance Law. Petitioner was sitting on the trunk of an automobile as far as appears without the invitation or knowledge of the driver. The automobile pulled away from the curb and petitioner fell off. This is not a “hit and run” within the contemplation of the statute (Flores v. MVAIC, N. Y. L. J., July 30, 1963, p. 7, col. 5). Concur — Stevens, P. J., Murphy, Lane, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Urena v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 42 A.D.2d 888, 347 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

42 A.D.2d 888 (Urena v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vega v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
59 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)