Urena v. Danny's Furniture Inc.
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 30388(U) (Urena v. Danny's Furniture Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Urena v Danny's Furniture Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 30388(U) January 29, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156994/2020 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 156994/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON.MARYV.ROSADO PART 33M Justice -------------------------------------------X 156994/2020 INDEX NO.
RAMON URENA, MOTION DATE 07/18/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 002 - V -
DANNY'S FURNITURE INC.,RENT -A-CENTER EAST INC. DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,23,24,25,26, 27, 28,29, 30, 31, 32 were read on this motion to/for DISMISS
Upon the foregoing documents, and after a final submission date of November 19, 2024,
Defendant Rent-A-Center East Inc. 's ("Defendant") motion to dismiss Plaintiff Ramon Urena's
("Decedent") Complaint pursuant to CPLR 1021 for failure to substitute an administrator of
Decedent's estate is denied. The cross-motion to substitute Mariel Elisa Urena as administrator of
Decedent's estate and to amend the caption is granted.
Plaintiff passed away in December of 2020 while hospitalized for a heart attack in the
Dominican Republic. The appointment of an administrator was complicated by Plaintiffs
somewhat unique familial circumstances: Decedent was survived by a biological daughter, two
adoptive daughters, a spouse, a divorce from a prior marriage in the Dominican Republic, two
other daughters born in the Dominican Republic, and as represented by counsel, a live-in girlfriend
of 38 years. Appointment of an administrator was further delayed due to documentation required
from the Dominican Republic, and although the estate was pending review in Surrogate's Court,
Letters of Administration were only issued on August 1, 2024 (see NYSCEF Doc. 31 ).
156994/2020 URENA, RAMON vs. DANNY'S FURNITURE INC. ET AL Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 002
[* 1] 1 of 5 INDEX NO. 156994/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2025
Meanwhile, just prior to the Letters of Administration being issued, Defendant moved to
dismiss this action in July of 2024. On August 27, 2024, counsel cross-moved to substitute
Decedent's eldest daughter, Mariel Elisa Urena as administrator of his estate. Defendant argues
that this case should be dismissed because substitution was not made "within a reasonable time."
This Court disagrees and denies Defendant's motion.
As a preliminary matter, there is a strong public policy in favor of having cases decided on
the merits (Gecaj v Gjonaj Realty & Management Corp., 149 AD3d 600 [1st Dept 2017]).
Moreover, the Court finds that the Decedent's complicated and international family structure
provides a reasonable excuse for the delay in substituting an administrator, and once letters of
administration were issued, counsel for the decedent showed diligence by promptly cross-moving
for substitution (see Velez v New York Presbyterian Hosp., 145 AD3d 632 [1st Dept 2016]
[showing of reasonable excuse and merits of action warranted denial of motion to dismiss and
granting substitution]). Further, the Court is satisfied with a demonstration of the potential merits
of the action as the Decedent personally verified the pleadings (see NYSCEF Doc. 1).
Defendant's bare allegations of prejudice due to the passage of time are insufficient to
defeat Plaintiffs cross-motion (see Public Adm 'r v Levine, 142 AD3d 467 [1st Dept 2016]). This
is especially the case where Defendant, who is presumably an owner or lessee of the premises, has
not provided any affidavit that it does not have in its possession CCTV footage of the incident or
an incident report. Further, there are likely patient narratives within the medical records detailing
the incident and the decedent's sister may be a witness who can testify further as to how the
incident happened.
Although Defendant seeks to obtain dismissal based on Plaintiffs failure to include a word
count certification, the Court finds dismissal of a Complaint based on such a minor technicality
156994/2020 URENA, RAMON vs. DANNY'S FURNITURE INC. ET AL Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 002
2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. 156994/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2025
would run afoul of this State's public policy in favor of having cases decided on the merits, and in
any event, CPLR § 200 I allows this Court to overlook this minor mistake. Likewise, the Court
finds dismissal of the action because Plaintiffs counsel failed to strictly follow the wording of
CPLR § 2106 in authoring their affirmation to be too harsh of a result. In any event, CPLR
§ 2106 docs not state that it must be followed strictly, but that an affirmation must be
"substantially" in the following form - with the thrust of the mandate being that the affirmation is
made under the penalties of perjury. Here, Plaintiffs counsel's affirmation was made "under
penalties of perjury" (see NYSCEF Doc. 30). Therefore, Defendant's motion is denied, and
Plaintiffs cross-motion is granted.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to
substitute timely an administrator is denied; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs cross-motion to substitute Mariel Elisa Urena as administrator
of Decedent's estate and to amend the caption is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that Mariel Elisa Urena, as limited administrator of the estate of Ramon Urena,
is substituted as the plaintiff in place and instead of Ramon Urena, now deceased; and it is further
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank}
156994/2020 URENA, RAMON vs. DANNY'S FURNITURE INC. ET AL Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 002
[* 3] 3 of 5 INDEX NO. 156994/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2025
ORDERED that the caption of the action is amended to read as follows:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X MARIEL ELISA URENA, as Limited Administrator of the Estate Of RAMON URENA, Deceased,
Index No.: 157481/2022 Plaintiff, -against-
DANNY'S FURNITURE INC and RENT-A-CENTER EAST, Inc., Defendants ------------------------------------------------------------------------X ; and it is further ORDERED that within ten days of entry, Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order with
notice of entry upon the Trial Support Office, and shall file the notice required by CPLR § 8019(c)
and a completed Form EF-22 with the County Clerk in accordance with the procedures set forth
in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed
Cases(accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website at the
address www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh), and the Trial Support Office shall thereupon amend
the court records accordingly; and it is further
ORDERED that the automatic stay imposed by decedent Ramon Urena's death hereby is
vacated and dissolved; and it is further
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 30388(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urena-v-dannys-furniture-inc-nysupctnewyork-2025.