Urbieta Oil, Inc. v. Ruiz

186 So. 3d 617, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3067, 2016 WL 833411
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 2016
DocketNo. 3D15-704
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 617 (Urbieta Oil, Inc. v. Ruiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Urbieta Oil, Inc. v. Ruiz, 186 So. 3d 617, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3067, 2016 WL 833411 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385 (Fla.2015); Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Co., 162 So.3d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(stating “[i]f the return [of service] is regular on its face, then the service of process is presumed to be valid and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence.”)(quoting Koster, 160 So.3d at 389).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lance Koster v. Carol Sullivan
160 So. 3d 385 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2015)
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Co.
162 So. 3d 1058 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 3d 617, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3067, 2016 WL 833411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urbieta-oil-inc-v-ruiz-fladistctapp-2016.