Urbanic v. Rosenfeld

631 A.2d 596, 534 Pa. 266, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 196
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 1993
DocketAppeal No. 11 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 631 A.2d 596 (Urbanic v. Rosenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Urbanic v. Rosenfeld, 631 A.2d 596, 534 Pa. 266, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 196 (Pa. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

LARSEN and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
631 A.2d 596, 534 Pa. 266, 1993 Pa. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urbanic-v-rosenfeld-pa-1993.