Urbanek v. United States
This text of 71 F.3d 855 (Urbanek v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
71 F.3d 855
77 A.F.T.R.2d 96-342
August URBANEK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-5285.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 4, 1996.
Gerald S. Walsh, Walsh & Keating, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, for Appellant.
Laurie E. Rucoba, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Gary R. Allen, Charles Bricken, Loretta C. Argrett, Kenneth L. Greene, Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 92-7149-CIV-WJZ), William J. Zloch, Judge.
Before COX, Circuit Judge, DYER, Senior Circuit Judge, and GOETTEL*, Senior District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The district court opinion is reported at 866 F.Supp. 1414. For the reasons enunciated there, which require no elaboration by us, we affirm.
Honorable Gerard L. Goettel, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 F.3d 855, 1996 WL 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urbanek-v-united-states-ca11-1996.