Urbanek v. Citrynell

409 N.E.2d 1001, 50 N.Y.2d 968, 431 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2512
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 26, 1980
StatusPublished

This text of 409 N.E.2d 1001 (Urbanek v. Citrynell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Urbanek v. Citrynell, 409 N.E.2d 1001, 50 N.Y.2d 968, 431 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2512 (N.Y. 1980).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (70 AD2d 912).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 N.E.2d 1001, 50 N.Y.2d 968, 431 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urbanek-v-citrynell-ny-1980.