Urban Ventures, Inc. v. Ferendino, Grafton, Spillis, Candella, Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Urban Ventures, Inc. v. Ferendino, Grafton, Spillis, Candella, Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc.

344 So. 2d 289, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15611

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1355

StatusPublished

This text of 344 So. 2d 289 (Urban Ventures, Inc. v. Ferendino, Grafton, Spillis, Candella, Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Urban Ventures, Inc. v. Ferendino, Grafton, Spillis, Candella, Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc., 344 So. 2d 289, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary final judgment in favor of the appellee, Ferendino, Grafton, Spillis, Candela, Architects, Engineers, Planners, Inc., in an action for damages arising out of a written agreement for architectural services between appellant Economic Enterprises, Inc., and appellee.

The record on appeal discloses that there are many genuine issues of material fact that have not been eliminated by the appellee. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Peoples Gas System, Inc. v. B & P Restaurant Corp., 271 So.2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). For instance, two of the triable issues are the liability of Urban Ventures, Inc., and the amount of damages assessable against either or both of the appellants.

The summary judgment is therefore, reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI