Urban Soccer, Inc. v. Royal Wine Corp.
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2146 (Urban Soccer, Inc. v. Royal Wine Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered August 22, 2016, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 8, 2016, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
The unambiguous rider to the sublease gave defendant sublessor the sole right to terminate the sublease and retain plaintiff’s deposit if the City of New York did not consent to the sublease within five months of June 11, 2015 (see Rogan LLC. v YHD Bowery Commercial Unit LLC, 132 AD3d 612 [1st Dept 2015]). Plaintiff had no right to declare the sublease null and void, and certainly not before the passage of the five-month period.
We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 2146, 148 A.D.3d 576, 48 N.Y.S.3d 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/urban-soccer-inc-v-royal-wine-corp-nyappdiv-2017.