Upton v. Wiley N. Jackson Co.

Duval County Circuit Court

Upton v. Wiley N. Jackson Co.

40 Fla. Supp. 153

CourtCircuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County

DecidedNovember 10, 1972

DocketNo. 72-2511

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Fla. Supp. 153 (Upton v. Wiley N. Jackson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Upton v. Wiley N. Jackson Co., 40 Fla. Supp. 153 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK H. ELMORE, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be heard upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the court having heard argument of counsel and having found as a matter of law that the defendant owed no duty to place or erect signal barricades or other devices to give warning of construction hazards ahead to the plaintiffs who were proceeding in the wrong direction on the highway, and the court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged —

(1) The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

(2) The plaintiffs shall take nothing by their suit and the defendant shall go hence without day, having and recovering of and from the plaintiffs its costs herein of $120.80, for which let execution issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK H. ELMORE, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be heard upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the court having heard argument of counsel and having found as a matter of law that the defendant owed no duty to place or erect signal barricades or other devices to give warning of construction hazards ahead to the plaintiffs who were proceeding in the wrong direction on the highway, and the court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged —

(1) The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted.

(2) The plaintiffs shall take nothing by their suit and the defendant shall go hence without day, having and recovering of and from the plaintiffs its costs herein of $120.80, for which let execution issue.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Fla. Supp. 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/upton-v-wiley-n-jackson-co-flacirct4duv-1972.