Upton v. Graves

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Upton v. Graves

509 S.W.2d 823, 255 Ark. 516

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 13, 1973

DocketCR 73-149

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 509 S.W.2d 823 (Upton v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Upton v. Graves, 509 S.W.2d 823, 255 Ark. 516 (Ark. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a petition for bail pending retrial of petitioner Harold Sherman Upton following the reversal of his first degree murder conviction, Upton v. State, 254 Ark. 664, 497 S.W. 2d 696. The trial court in refusing bail as in capital offense cases recognized the effect of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1972), on our death penalty statutes, but took the position that Act 438 of 1973 reinstated the death penalty as to felony murder cases committed prior to the effective date thereof. We disagree.

Since the authorities define an ex post facto law as one that renders an act punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable when committed, White v. Brown, 468 F. 2d 301 (9th Cir. 1972), it follows that, in view of Graham v. State, 253 Ark. 462, 486 S.W. 2d 678 and Kuehn v. State, 253 Ark. 889, 489 S.W. 2d 505, the capital felony provisions of Act 438 cannot be applied retrospectively to offenses committed prior to its adoption, Ark. Const. Art. 2 § 17.

This matter is referred back to the trial court for the fixing of bail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This is a petition for bail pending retrial of petitioner Harold Sherman Upton following the reversal of his first degree murder conviction, Upton v. State, 254 Ark. 664, 497 S.W. 2d 696. The trial court in refusing bail as in capital offense cases recognized the effect of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1972), on our death penalty statutes, but took the position that Act 438 of 1973 reinstated the death penalty as to felony murder cases committed prior to the effective date thereof. We disagree.

Since the authorities define an ex post facto law as one that renders an act punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable when committed, White v. Brown, 468 F. 2d 301 (9th Cir. 1972), it follows that, in view of Graham v. State, 253 Ark. 462, 486 S.W. 2d 678 and Kuehn v. State, 253 Ark. 889, 489 S.W. 2d 505, the capital felony provisions of Act 438 cannot be applied retrospectively to offenses committed prior to its adoption, Ark. Const. Art. 2 § 17.

This matter is referred back to the trial court for the fixing of bail.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 S.W.2d 823, 255 Ark. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/upton-v-graves-ark-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack