Upthegrove v. Doctor's Hospital, Underwriters Adjusting Co.

586 So. 2d 1230, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9690, 1991 WL 185189
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1991·No. No. 90-3366·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Judge of Compensation Claims’ award of benefits and finding that claimant reached maximum medical improvement from her physical injuries. This affirmance is without prejudice to the issue of overall MMI being revisited should the subsequent psychiatric evaluation ordered lead to a diagnosis of a work related psychiatric injury. See Copeland Steel v. Miles, 536 So.2d 1179 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Orlando Concrete Contractors v. Hinds, 466 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and WOLF, JJ., and CAWTHON, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upthegrove v. Doctor's Hospital, Underwriters Adjusting Co., 586 So. 2d 1230, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9690, 1991 WL 185189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 1230 (Upthegrove v. Doctor's Hospital, Underwriters Adjusting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ivey v. State
586 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)