Uptegrove v. Central Railroad

City of New York Municipal Court

Uptegrove v. Central Railroad

14 Misc. 460

DecidedNovember 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Misc. 460 (Uptegrove v. Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Uptegrove v. Central Railroad, 14 Misc. 460 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

McOabthy, J.

Both sides having moved for á direction of a verdict, left the question of law and fact to the trial, justice‘to determine.

We have examined the facts vei'y carefully and under Park v. Preston, 108 N. Y. 434, 487, think the judgment should be .affirmed, and, so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Grand Trunk Railway of Ganada, 127 N. Y. 449.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs:

judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI