Uptegrove v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey
35 N.Y.S. 1118, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 896
This text of 35 N.Y.S. 1118 (Uptegrove v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Uptegrove v. Central R. Co. of New Jersey, 35 N.Y.S. 1118, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 896 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
Both sides, having moved for a direction of a verdict, left the questions of law and fact to the trial justice to determine. We have examined the facts very carefully, and, under Park v. Preston, 108 N. Y. 434, 437, 15 N. E. 705, think the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs. See Jennings v. Railway Co., 127 N. Y. 449. 28 N. E. 394.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jennings v. Grand Trunk Railway
28 N.E. 394 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
Park v. . Preston
15 N.E. 705 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 N.Y.S. 1118, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uptegrove-v-central-r-co-of-new-jersey-nynyccityct-1895.