Uptain v. State

101 So. 75, 20 Ala. App. 111, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 178
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 3, 1924
Docket6 Div. 410.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 So. 75 (Uptain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Uptain v. State, 101 So. 75, 20 Ala. App. 111, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 178 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

There are no sufficient exceptions to the rulings of the trial court to present any question to this court for consideration and review save the ruling of the court in denying the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The evidence offered on this motion, while material, was merely cumulative, and as such would not justify the trial court in setting aside the verdict of the jury nor authorize this court in reversing the case. Grissett v. State, 18 Ala. App. 675, 94 South. 271.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
198 So. 153 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 75, 20 Ala. App. 111, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uptain-v-state-alactapp-1924.