Upshaw v. James
22 F. App'x 28
This text of 22 F. App'x 28 (Upshaw v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Upshaw v. James, 22 F. App'x 28 (1st Cir. 2001).
Opinion
After due consideration of the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. The appellant failed to state any claim cognizable by the federal court.
Affirmed. Loe. R. 27(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
22 F. App'x 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/upshaw-v-james-ca1-2001.