Home/First Circuit/Upshaw v. James

Upshaw v. James

22 F. App'x 28
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided November 30, 2001·No. No. 01-1625·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After due consideration of the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. The appellant failed to state any claim cognizable by the federal court.

Affirmed. Loe. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upshaw v. James, 22 F. App'x 28 (1st Cir. 2001).

22 F. App'x 28 (Upshaw v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.