Upshaw v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES

241 S.E.2d 41, 144 Ga. App. 222, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2644
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 1, 1977·No. 54795·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

Appellant’s parental rights were terminated by order of the juvenile court. He brings this appeal on several grounds, but we find it appropriate to address only one of them: the form and sufficiency of the order.

In Crook v. Dept. of Human Resources, 137 Ga. App. 817 (224 SE2d 806), this court held that explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law are required in an order terminating parental rights on the ground of deprivation. The required findings are set out in Code Ann. § 24A-3201 (a) (2). The findings in the order in this case are not sufficient under that standard.

"We remand the appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. [Cit.]” Crook v. Dept. of Human Resources, supra, p. 819.

Appeal remanded with direction.

Bell, C. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upshaw v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES, 241 S.E.2d 41, 144 Ga. App. 222, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2644 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

241 S.E.2d 41 (Upshaw v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Interest of H. T.
402 S.E.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Patty v. Department of Human Resources
260 S.E.2d 551 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
McCary v. Department of Human Resources
259 S.E.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)