Upshaw v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Upshaw v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES

241 S.E.2d 41, 144 Ga. App. 222, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2644

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 1, 1977

Docket54795

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 241 S.E.2d 41 (Upshaw v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Upshaw v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES, 241 S.E.2d 41, 144 Ga. App. 222, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2644 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Shulman, Judge.

Appellant’s parental rights were terminated by order of the juvenile court. He brings this appeal on several grounds, but we find it appropriate to address only one of them: the form and sufficiency of the order.

In Crook v. Dept. of Human Resources, 137 Ga. App. 817 (224 SE2d 806), this court held that explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law are required in an order terminating parental rights on the ground of deprivation. The required findings are set out in Code Ann. § 24A-3201 (a) (2). The findings in the order in this case are not sufficient under that standard.

"We remand the appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. [Cit.]” Crook v. Dept. of Human Resources, supra, p. 819.

Appeal remanded with direction.

Bell, C. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI