Uppercu v. Stevens
This text of 160 A.D. 918 (Uppercu v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the plaintiff presented to the court below no complaint showing that a cause of action existed which would entitle the plaintiff to an injunction, the court was without authority, under section 603 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to grant a temporary injunction. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 A.D. 918, 145 N.Y.S. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uppercu-v-stevens-nyappdiv-1914.