Upper Nyack Methodist Episcopal Church v. Bennet

New York Supreme Court

Upper Nyack Methodist Episcopal Church v. Bennet

26 N.Y.S. 341, 73 Hun 585, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 521

DecidedDecember 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y.S. 341 (Upper Nyack Methodist Episcopal Church v. Bennet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Upper Nyack Methodist Episcopal Church v. Bennet, 26 N.Y.S. 341, 73 Hun 585, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 521 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

The plaintiff established a good and valid title to the premises in question. The land was conveyed in 1813 by one William Palmer to certain trustees “to erect a house of worship for the use of the members of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States of America.” Subsequently, under a general act for the incorporation of religious societies, the plaintiff was incorporated by certificate duly filed, and in 1859 the sole surviving trustee named in the deed conveyed the property to the plaintiff. The church has been used for religious services for many years. The defendants entered upon the property by force and without permission of the owner, and cut down two beautiful shellbark hickory trees- and one cedar. The hickories were proven to be worth $200 each, and the injury to the entire lot by digging up sod and removing fences, including the trees, was proven to have reduced the value of the premises nearly or quite $1,000. The jury found the value of the trees to have been $300, and the injury from the trespass otherwise- at $50. These amounts were not excessive under the evidence. The injury was great. The trees were in their prime, and made the church, with them, “a picturesque thing,” as described by the defendant Bennet. This picture was destroyed, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount given by the jury as the damages sustained thereby. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

The plaintiff established a good and valid title to the premises in question. The land was conveyed in 1813 by one William Palmer to certain trustees “to erect a house of worship for the use of the members of the Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States of America.” Subsequently, under a general act for the incorporation of religious societies, the plaintiff was incorporated by certificate duly filed, and in 1859 the sole surviving trustee named in the deed conveyed the property to the plaintiff. The church has been used for religious services for many years. The defendants entered upon the property by force and without permission of the owner, and cut down two beautiful shellbark hickory trees- and one cedar. The hickories were proven to be worth $200 each, and the injury to the entire lot by digging up sod and removing fences, including the trees, was proven to have reduced the value of the premises nearly or quite $1,000. The jury found the value of the trees to have been $300, and the injury from the trespass otherwise- at $50. These amounts were not excessive under the evidence. The injury was great. The trees were in their prime, and made the church, with them, “a picturesque thing,” as described by the defendant Bennet. This picture was destroyed, and the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount given by the jury as the damages sustained thereby. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y.S. 341, 73 Hun 585, 80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/upper-nyack-methodist-episcopal-church-v-bennet-nysupct-1893.