Uppal v. Las Palmas Condominium Association, Hadad
This text of Uppal v. Las Palmas Condominium Association, Hadad (Uppal v. Las Palmas Condominium Association, Hadad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
NEELAM UPPAL,
Petitioner,
v.
LAS PALMAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION; WISAM MOHAMMAD HADAD; YHL CAPITAL, LLC; JENNIFER ZIELINSKI; SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC; UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES, LLC; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC.,
Respondents.
No. 2D2025-2440
April 22, 2026
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Rebecca L. Hamilton, Judge.
Neelam Uppal, pro se.
Jason Michael Azzarone of LaCava Jacobson & Goodis, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents Las Palmas Condominium Association and Sentry Management, Inc.
Charles Gallagher of Gallagher & Associates Law Firm, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Respondents Wisam Mohammad Hadad and YHL Capital, LLC.
No Appearance for remaining Respondents.
PER CURIAM. Dismissed.
KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uppal v. Las Palmas Condominium Association, Hadad, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uppal-v-las-palmas-condominium-association-hadad-fladistctapp-2026.