Uppal v. Health Law Firm
138 S. Ct. 650, 199 L. Ed. 2d 586
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 8, 2018
DocketNo. 17–517.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 138 S. Ct. 650 (Uppal v. Health Law Firm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Uppal v. Health Law Firm, 138 S. Ct. 650, 199 L. Ed. 2d 586 (U.S. 2018).
Opinion
Motion of respondent for attorney's fees and sanctions denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mackey v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institute
S.D. Ohio, 2019
In re Wogenstahl
902 F.3d 621 (Sixth Circuit, 2018)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
138 S. Ct. 650, 199 L. Ed. 2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uppal-v-health-law-firm-scotus-2018.