Uppal v. Department of Health
This text of Uppal v. Department of Health (Uppal v. Department of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2991 _____________________________
NEELAM TANEJA UPPAL,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Board of Medicine. Scot Ackerman, Chair.
November 27, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the final order of the Department of Health revoking Appellant’s license to practice medicine because of violations of sections 458.331(1)(b) and 458.331(1)(x), Florida Statutes. The Department provided competent, substantial evidence that the violations occurred upon the revocation of Appellant’s medical license by the State of New York in January 2017 as well as Appellant’s practice of medicine during February and March 2019 in violation of a Department order in a previous, separate disciplinary proceeding.
Because Appellant establishes no ground under section 120.68(7), Florida Statutes, to set aside the agency final order, the order is AFFIRMED.
RAY, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Neelam Taneja Uppal, pro se, Appellant.
Sarah Young Hodges, Chief Appellate Counsel, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Uppal v. Department of Health, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/uppal-v-department-of-health-fladistctapp-2024.